The same opportunity for skewed interpretation based on shading (see Politico description above) holds true for this NYT visualization. You can zoom in and toggle between states, counties, and size of lead. state abbreviation guidelines, although Texas is abbreviated on the NYT map. Note that the state labels on both of these maps are similar as well – both seem to follow the A.P. The New York Times Presidential Election Results map is very similar to the Politico election results map in design, including coloring, projection, and layout. New York Times Presidential Election Results You may see a larger area of shading across the map in the losing candidates color, but densely populated areas like the northeast provide more electoral votes to the winning candidate (although they look small on the map). States are shaded with the winning candidates color, but population (and number of available electoral votes) is not reflected in the size of the state shape on the map. Large swaths of color on this map may lead you to question election results. Clicking on a state presents a pop-up window that includes details like number of available electoral votes, candidate names, and percent of polling locations reporting. The full-width map includes square icons for northeast states that can’t fit a label within their boundary. ![]() The Politico 2016 Presidential Election Results map displays the legal boundaries of the states. Politico 2016 Presidential Election Results So how do you read these maps? We’ll help you interpret the data and give you some context as to why you see different types of maps across different platforms.ġ. We compiled a list of 2016 Election maps you need at your watch parties tonight!īut each live election map displays voting results in different ways.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |